add one summarized case law H u m a n i t i e s

i prefer to write the title here so it will be hidden .

Title : Is there a
distinction between human trafficking and the smuggling of migrants?

• It is a critique essay .

• My Professor guidance : In International Law, a distinction is made between human
  trafficking, involving the ‘exploitation for forced labour, sexual exploitation
  or other forms of exploitation’ and the smuggling of migrants which connotes
  ‘procurement, for financial or material gain, of the illegal entry into a country
  of which that individual is neither a citizen nor permanent resident’. However,
  this distinction is being increasingly challenged in the scholarly literature.

  You should write a short academic essay in response to the
  question: Is there a distinction between human trafficking and the
  smuggling of migrants?  Your
  analysis should be a sustained reflection on the key elements of this scholarly
  debate drawing extensively on the academic literature, evaluating the
  detractions, merits and implications of the respective divergent arguments.

  As well as undertaking your own research, you should read and refer
  to the recommended and suggested reading outlined in the worksheets for
  Workshops One & Two in the module guide.

• Required
  Reading will be attached for yourself  + other academic books as sources (my
  professor dislike online resources) .
•   2000
  words only !

•   Harvard
  style of referencing .
•  30 list
  of references (including what I have attached ). It must be based on a good
  piece of research , to show the professor that I understood what I have read.
• I don’t
  want a factual answer explaining what is human trafficking and what’s smuggling
  .the  lecturer repeated many times and
  explained that I should build a strong argument . off course describing a bit ,what
  they are (add one summarized case law for each) ? and the main question is there a distinction
  between them ?? why do I think there is a distinction ??Illustrate different
  arguments between academics among who think there is a distinction and  who don’t? and My opinion should be backed up
  with citations which support my opinion!
• please follow my instructions . if anything you didnt understand write back to me .