michael jones suffered severe physical injury H e a l t h M e d i c a l

michael jones suffered severe physical injury H e a l t h M e d i c a l


What struck you about the contents of this podcast?

The issue of Tommy becoming more distraught than Amada despite the fact that Amada had a lot to lose than him is one of the main things that first struck my mind. However, I believe that it should have been vice versa. Additionally, at last, it is incredible that Tommy is the one filing a law case rather than Amada. This indicates that emotions affect us differently. Normally, men are regarded as stronger; therefore, they are perceived to have all the capabilities to manage their emotions contrary to women whom society views as emotionally weak. As such, Tommy versus Amada’s case leaves me entirely perplexed. It further appalling that the things humans do are mainly reactions to their respective emotions, and this can be exemplified by the case of the African American boy who is shot by a police officer.

Some of the ideas about emotions and the way trauma impacts the brain might be controversial. How did you react to these ideas?

From my perspective, people are differently affected by traumatic occurrences or events. As stated above, it is amusing that numerous things that people do are primarily to soothe their emotions. It is evident that Tommy was affected by accident more than one could anticipate. Nature expects men to exemplify strong character when some traumatic occurrences struck them since this is what they are always prepared for from childhood. This is further expected to be applied the same whenever an individual pass on. Such issues negatively impact specific individuals, particularly women, in comparison to others. Therefore, it is too baffling that the manner Tommy could present his emotions to an end was mainly through filing a court case. The question that comes into my mind is; what if he lost the case to Amada? Would his tribulation have come to an end or worsened?

How would you challenge them, or how might you be intrigued to explore more?

The advisable approach to confront distressing effects on us is to discover more on them in addition to the manner that they impact us, to what extreme, and the way to manage them. Importantly, we should all understand that we are naturally not the same and therefore consider people who seem to be more emotionally affected than the rest of us. I have no doubt that our cultural and traditional modes of life are essential. Therefore, it is essential to understand how to raise up our children to ensure that they will be able to overcome the emotions that arise following traumatic events, mainly through the concepts of emotions that we educate them.

POST 2 –

What struck me the most about this podcast’s contents was not the findings on emotion, but the fact that Tommy sued the parents of Micheala and won. In doing so, Tommy undoubtedly caused more emotional distress for the family with extensive litigation. The new developments into emotional research (and his therapist) would have rendered his case most because it blames the Thornberry’s for his emotional damage rather than the culture. If Tommy believed that emotions happened to a person like a physical injury, suing the Thornberry’s was like cutting open an old wound.

I was not surprised by the ideas about how trauma and emotion impact the brain. I understand the way that people react to things is cultural. Religion is a critical factor in how people react to situations as well. I was somewhat surprised by the Doctor’s take on PTSD. I have always thought of PTSD as an anxiety disorder like OCD. The Doctor’s theory that PTSD was entirely in the control of those it affected surprised me.

Because I do not have enough information to challenge the ideas, I would most likely dig into the Doctor’s work and research if there are any universal concepts. I would imagine that concepts we use to survive, like fear of falling a long distance would be present in most cultures. I would also explore the possibility that these concepts exist across cultures and do not necessarily affect what emotions we feel, but instead affect how we express them. PTSD can also be physiological; therefore, I would have to challenge how emotional, cultural concepts could solely cause it.


1. What struck you about the contents of this podcast?

The podcast made me realize just how elusive is the concept of emotion and its prevalent cultural variations. It was astonishing to realize that people associate expressing feelings with weakness, curb talking about sentiments, and consider sensitivity contradictory to manhood (Spiegel & Rosin, 2017). In contrast, the example of Makayla’s emotional upbringing presented the much-needed side of the importance of accepting how one feels. This wide gap in the perception and comprehension of emotive responsiveness made me realize that emotions, though biological, are not acknowledged by all.

2. Some of the ideas about emotions and the way trauma impacts the brain might be controversial. How did you react to these ideas?

The story of the accident and lawsuit involving Tommy Jarrett and the Jones presented an atypical view on the extent to which trauma can psychologically harm a person. Tommy’s emotional distress tormented him to the extent that he was incapable of carrying out routine activities. On the one hand, it was sad to acknowledge that the aftermath of the accident was linked with how Tommy’s father raised him to be an emotionally stunted adult. However, it was hard for me to accept that the court gave a ruling in favor of Tommy based on the opinion that emotions are uncontrollable triggers, even though the Joneses lost a daughter, and Michael Jones suffered severe physical injury. But on contemplation, I found that the judgment passed was only significant as it acknowledged that the medical importance of mental trauma was equal to physical damage.

3. How would you challenge those ideas, or how might you be intrigued to explore more?

The viewpoints on emotions are mainly based on prevailing communal perceptions and, therefore, vary among societies. I feel when people say they do not “feel” emotions, they say that they ignore a biologically-ingrained human instinct. “Interoceptive sensations” is a way of the brain communicating with the body, and therefore, emotions cannot be sidelined or treated as triggers (Spiegel & Rosin, 2017). If ignored, like “light,” unknown emotions can take their powerful energy and send a person down a spiral. Acknowledging feelings, as experienced by Renato, is a step towards healing from trauma (Spigel, 2017). So, recognizing these signals is vital for the healthy existence of a person.


  • 1-Write one response for each post at least 200 words.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount